Not included in Eli's latest: 1) Flynn ALSO unregistered agent 2) Other ways to get Flynn's name 3) Known req for just 1 namehttps://twitter.com/EliLake/status/849736783524966401 …
-
-
It is obvious your little posts are propaganda. Please exhibit an ounce of pride & stop digging. Or at least sit on these things b4 posting
-
I will leave you to your hysteria.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Sorry
@emptywheel, you're lost in it. Half your SIX GAPING HOLES are speculation the other half irrelevant to Lake's point: Something burger -
It's speculation that Mike Flynn did work for the Turks and only afterwards--and after changing policy--registered as required by law?
-
You know and have analyzed a lot more than any of us have/can but you're lost in it all. Lake writes. It's a fair decent piece w/ a point
-
I asked you if that was speculation. There are official documents validating that point. How is it speculation?
-
That's a bullet point irrelevant to the piece. Lake's not attempting to include every single element casting shade on Flynn's role.
-
It's not relevant when he's raising foreign powers? When he's raising what is legit reason for unmasking? Of course it is?
-
Rice herself hadn't known Flynn's status as a registered agent of Turkey at the time the unmasking btw - if this all hinges on that point.
-
You mean Rice didn't read what was public, Cummins' complaints abt him not registering? Or all the stuff abt his $$ fr RU? Bc I had.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That's a little confusing. Incidental cllection (and unmasking, too, no?) was at least included in "backdoor search" criticism, no?
-
Incidental collection is. Not unmasking. Backdoor searches are accessing raw data.
-
Ah - before any *masking*. Gotcha. BIG difference, re this convo, I see.
-
Right. Back door searches are accessing raw data w/no necessary suspicion. Unmasking comes w/context, tested reason for accessing.
-
And what is that reason for consumers, Marcy? Did you even read the column? It’s whether it helps explains the intel.
-
You've made only reason "threat of a terrorist or cyber attack" - but that just seems like nonsense. What about espionage?
-
Right. That's obvious hole #4. Eli pretends the threat that IS WHY FISA WAS CREATED--foreign spying--is the issue here.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.