Devin Nunes, March 22: Dozens. US Intel Official who may be Nunes April 4: At least one.pic.twitter.com/DHVq8cUEEi
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Devin Nunes, March 22: Dozens. US Intel Official who may be Nunes April 4: At least one.pic.twitter.com/DHVq8cUEEi
From now on I'm going to pretend every anonymous US Intel Official source is Nunes. Because it makes it funny.
Nah, sometimes it's a Dem Gang of Four members. Burr, to his credit, actually backs his insistence on secrecy with general secrecy.
Also if the US intel official is bitching abt leaks, it's usu Peter King wailing about a leak he has spread.
Are you asking if @DevinNunes can count...with his socks on?
He should be able to count to at least 4 with his socks on. Which is greater than one, I hope he knows.
1 or "dozens" it's concerning.
Your argument is the National Security Advisor should not be concerned about who FSB-trained sanctioned bank heads are talking to?
That's a dumb question.
because as long as they say it once into the ether, it becomes an neverending rallying cry for the right.
Did they forget her job title? A national security advisor would sometimes need to see this type of stuff, yes?
It’s written so dishonestly it just kind of reminds me of typical WSJ OpEd which I normally ignore.
As we say here inside the Beltway, one thing leads to another...
Rwanda led to Sierra Leone, which led to South Sudan and Libya, which led to Syria (but was aborted) which led to only Susan knows what!
Obama could kill someone on live tv and YouTube it for all to see and CNN would only cover the GOP "overreach."
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.