So no. You didn't watch the hearing. You're just making shit up and calling women bitches when they point out you're making shit up? Gotcha.
That doesn't excuse affirmatively misleading reporting or affirmatively flat wrong discussion of it. Which was my point you DISAGREED with.
-
-
I don't it's particularly misleading. Hearings mentioned RU's social media campaign. That naturally includes the targeting of Bernie Bros.
-
LOLOLOL. The RS story is a shit-show and it has you very very confused. In any case, you disagreed w/me abt HEARING and were wrong.
-
Not really. Not mentioning RU's Bernie campaign explicitly doesn't mean it shouldn't be inferred from the testimony.
-
Again, you made stuff up. That's okay. Just understand that you do that. Bye!
-
No, I didn't. Are you going to address @cem3394 tweet? I think it actually show you're the sloppy one. Not Rawstory.
-
Your final answer is that a ref to a doc written in 2012 abt accurate 2011 reporting was a ref to BernieBros? LOLOLOLOLOLOL.
-
'Far left' includes Bernie bros. Rawstory's inference was reasonable.
-
Yes. You are now living in a magic time machine where 2016 events happened in 2011. Do you understand how much of a BOZO you're being?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Rawstory simply honed in on that to help put pieces together for Bernie readers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.