You are having a very big reading comprehension problem. I'm moving on. But do try to do better. This is part of the problem.
To not raise the TOTALLY unrelated HuffPo story leading people to believe "BernieBros" got mentioned.
-
-
Fair enough, but I do think the hearing mentioning RU's twitter and/or social media campaign naturally connects to Ryan Grim's Huffpo piece.
-
Well, they could have spent that space reporting clearly. Instead they wrote an affirmatively misleading piece.
-
That's just my guess.
-
That doesn't excuse affirmatively misleading reporting or affirmatively flat wrong discussion of it. Which was my point you DISAGREED with.
-
I don't it's particularly misleading. Hearings mentioned RU's social media campaign. That naturally includes the targeting of Bernie Bros.
-
LOLOLOL. The RS story is a shit-show and it has you very very confused. In any case, you disagreed w/me abt HEARING and were wrong.
-
Not really. Not mentioning RU's Bernie campaign explicitly doesn't mean it shouldn't be inferred from the testimony.
-
Again, you made stuff up. That's okay. Just understand that you do that. Bye!
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.