Everyone's going to run w/"trail of dead Russians" line fr non-RU expert who also says we need better editorial standards, watch.
Where did I say they should be ignored? They should not, however, all be assumed to be evidence relating to RU hack or even of foul play.
-
-
his line was about what leads the committee should follow. He said follow the $ and trail of dead Russians. Seems like
advice -
Oh. So follow the trail of things that have no demonstrable tie to this? Um. No. That's fucking asinine and alarmist.
-
And a "science partisan" should be ashamed to even suggest such a thing.
-
yes biases are such a shameful thing. Let's just pretend they don't exist bc that's super useful to lie.
-
You INVENTED shit about what I was saying to distract from fact you were endorsing bad evidentiary standards. Stop. Think.
-
he did not say it as evidence! He told the committee where he thinks they should explore
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.