who said that?
-
-
-
Watts (he didn't mention Guccifer--there's a lot of bad coverage on Guccifer).
-
guccifer 2.0 u mean?
-
ya lotta pols & pundits seem ignorant to fact that those tracks were likely intentionally left. V curious element.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
is there a popular explanation for that? I severely don't get why APT28 would do that.
-
Explanation I've seen from intel sources is that they wanted to us to know they hit us.
-
Why go 2 trouble of using blank template (w/RU stylesheet) THEN adding Russian name after, etc? intel sources are talking some bullsht.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Tell us, couldn't that be false atribution?
-
It could. I don't think it is, exactly.
-
Did you just hear the "Ministry of Truth" idea lol
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Explain to me what sense it makes for Russia or their hackers to purposely add Russian metadata.
-
No one I know has presented a convincing explanation for that. But it is a question that needs to be answered.
-
I would agree. I accept the IC consensus but that has never made sense to me. At all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Watts has multiple hard to understand agendas today
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.