... and "verified" his own claims.
-
-
Steele -- as a person -- only entered the story after the release. So of course. But if you read even the original closely...
-
... it's there in the subtext.
-
(Yes, I know I've tweeted that at you before. I also know you're very protective of Steele's motives.)
-
Please stop asserting that. It's simply not true.
-
OK. I know we disagree abt Steele. Repeatedly. We appear to still disagree. That's fair.
-
I'm not even sure we disagree! I really don't know where you're getting the sense that I'm "protective" of Steele's motives...
-
... or anything like that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.