The meta-question I have about all of this is why it's being leaked to British journalists. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-39435786 …
But that's almost precisely the language used to describe why Steele refused to continue working w/FBI in October.
-
-
No offense, but I think you're reaching here.
-
There were 3 different stories abt why FBI didn't pay him. None made sense. All included that explanation tho.
-
The function of THIS story is, again, to raise concerns abt whether FBI is doing the right thing. Same line, same function.
-
Sure, maybe that's one big coinkydink. But that message sure seems to get associated w/Steele's name at every turn.
-
That alleged concern of Steele's was part of the story from the get-go. http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2017/01/spy-who-wrote-trump-russia-memos-it-was-hair-raising-stuff …
-
Part of Steele's story since the dossier was released. The ORIGINAL was an effort to force FBI to ... I'm not sure what.
-
Steele -- as a person -- only entered the story after the release. So of course. But if you read even the original closely...
-
... it's there in the subtext.
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.