@onlxn that's funny....all carriers keep text records for 5 years
-
-
only after they've been summoned, it would be
-
True. Tho there have been records protection orders to WH.
-
The legal standard is "knew or should have known" it was material to an ongoing investigation.
-
applied in this context, it would likely fail for vagueness and overbreadth, since no crime has been identified
-
Unless the person knows a crime was committed because they were involved. The nature of digital comms make it
-
highly likely a copy will surface, which adds obstruction to conspiracy and whatever crime was under investigtn
-
the point-there is no crime until someone in law enforcement names a statute violated.
-
That statement is insane. You're saying if I murder someone and PD havent found the body, no crime occurred?
- 6 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@chiefster16 and@FoxNews is whining about leaks.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But the cell "provider" has the "personal history" that can now be sold to the "highest bidder". Instant Karma
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
hahahaha "purging" their phones. Ok grandpa, they'll never figure that out.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yup. WH was already ordered to preserve everything. This is willful destruction of possible evidence.
-
Something criminals typically only do when being dinged for obstruction is deemed less bad than what would be found as evidence.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@mla1396 And destroying evidence in a federal caseThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.