Estimates provided by the PCLOB report. Even if more you're dishonestly conflating bulk orders with new system
-
-
Replying to @JakeLaperruque @FutureTenseNow
D00d. The dragnet was at 2 hops by Obama order. Before usaf.https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2014/03/27/fact-sheet-administration-s-proposal-ending-section-215-bulk-telephony-m …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SeanVitka @FutureTenseNow
That was queries, it was a BULK COLLECTION program and was banned
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
I don't think definition of dragnet is as fully disintegrated as you are suggesting. IC still querying all records by proxy
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SeanVitka
@FutureTenseNow what does that even mean? You've gone from lies to incoherent garble1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
before USAF everyone's records could be collected. That was the bulk collection. That is now banned
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
that program was in no way codified. That line is a completely inaccurate description of the law
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
I'm kind of amused you guys are arguing over "some ways codified" and ALSO neither talking 12333.
@SeanVitka2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
my concern is with description of the status of a domestic bulk collection program
@SeanVitka1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Yeah. But you keep throwing around words
@SeanVitka didn't use.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
In any case, USPs are still subject to bulk collex of metadata. NSA just ALSO gets connection chaining now. @SeanVitka
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.