And you know this how?
-
-
I think your argument should be that she didn't run any ads, not that they weren't policy. McCain had more policy than anyone. Didn't help.
-
I'm happy to make that wrt WI and MI, and have. But she ALSO didn't differentiate herself on policy level fr Trump
-
Trump was just the anti- candidate, and the study just shows that ads weren't the deciding factor b/c she actually had more.
-
No. It showed that she deviated from the norm of the last half century of explaining why you're better than opponent.
-
I think they were far more factors that decided this election than what was in some 30 second ads that most people fast forward through.
-
Sure. Including Hillary didn't campaign in rural areas (of course, that's moot in MI and WI, bc she didn't really campaign)
-
But THIS THREAD is abt whether desperate voters should have been expected to make policy choice they weren't presented.
-
Again, if you're making that once in 4 years choice based on what you see in 30 sec ads, damn right I hold my fellow Americans accountable.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The study also shows that Trump ran even less ads than Hillary. Probably the reason for her lack of buys.
-
Not in WI.
@matthewstoller
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.