I'm saying an independent study shows that. ALso shows Hillary ran totally unsubstantive ads. @shmr50 @matthewstoller
-
-
And for the 4th time, you haven't explained why you think policy ads would have worked!
-
For 5th time, that's not Q. It's that YOU are holding voters accountable for policies not advertised
@TheRealJMole@matthewstoller -
You can go back and say you were an idiot for doing that and we'll be done.
@TheRealJMole@matthewstoller -
Well, since I did not do that... pass
-
Sure you did. Right here.
@TheRealJMole@matthewstoller https://twitter.com/shmr50/status/844872555383177217 …This Tweet is unavailable. -
Wasn't that the substance of her most popular ad, "Measure"?
-
You mean an ad that wasn't shown in either WI or MI, bc she showed no ads in either state until last 2 weeks?
@matthewstoller -
I really would like to read that study if you have a link to it, btw.
- 11 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
For a guy who wants to hold others responsible for info they might get you're sure slow on uptake.
@TheRealJMole@matthewstollerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You also have to show how her lack of policy ads affected voters choices. If that is your argument.
-
No. The argument IN THIS THREAD is that voters can be held responsible for voting against her policies
@shmr50@matthewstoller
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Maybe attach the study. And I guess you're assuming the study was accurate? What was their methodology?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.