OK, fuckface, as I've just explained EVEN in speeches, he spoke more abt infrastructure and anti-TPP @shmr50 @matthewstoller
-
-
Replying to @TheRealJMole
Sure, And that totally absolves her failures for the $1B in advertising she totally controlled?
@shmr50@matthewstoller1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
What do you think the candidate from the incumbent party does? Can you honestly say you know Trump's policies were?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheRealJMole
Well, VERY early on I pointed out how infrastructure & trade was going to hurt Hilary.
@shmr50@matthewstoller2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Other than a wall at the border, what infrastructure plans did Trump present? And do people even know that TPP was a plan to fight China?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheRealJMole
He promised to invest $1T in infrastructure spending. Showed up in ads!
@shmr50@matthewstoller2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Dude, lies aren't policy. Where was that money coming from? Where was it going? He also said he was going to bring coal jobs back.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheRealJMole
Dude. TPP is a lie. So thanks. But that's besides the point abt what Hillary said to voters when she totally controlled
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
She was in the incumbent party, was she supposed to run against the last 8 years. The Dems had the most progressive platform in history.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think you're still missing the point. That platform? Didn't make it into ads that desperate voters would see.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.