Not abt winning. It's abt why people thought Trump offered more solutions than Hillary. It's bc he highlighted them. @matthewstoller
We're talking voters who are very desperate. How many checked into speeches & why should they? @shmr50 @matthewstoller
-
-
No the point is they went against anyone who wasn't status quo because their lives sucked. They voted for the guy with zero experience.
-
Point IN THIS THREAD is whether they should have voted for Hillary's policies she didn't advertise.
@shmr50@matthewstoller -
Neither you, I or Matt knows whether it would have made a difference.
-
Which for 3rd time wasn't point. It was you're punching down rather than holding Hillary accountable
@TheRealJMole@matthewstoller -
I don't have a prob saying Hill made mistakes in her campaign, but people made a BAD CHOICE out of fear and desperation. Media didn't help.
-
They made a bad choice. ONE reason they made that bad choice is bc Hillary didn't tell them policies
@shmr50@matthewstoller -
And you know this how?
-
Sigh. For the FOURTH time, bc study shows that Hillary's ads were historically void of policy.
@TheRealJMole@matthewstoller - 19 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This entire thread is abt fact that Hillary, in ads she completely controlled, did not explain policy.
@shmr50@matthewstollerThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.