Btw, did you see the study that showed Hillary did FAR less policy advertising than any recent president? @matthewstoller
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
I did. The press did not cover her policy speeches. Did you see that?
3 replies 1 retweet 13 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
So that absolves her for not highlighting it at all when she has complete control over the message?
@matthewstoller2 replies 1 retweet 25 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
She could have done more policy ads. But she was winning pre Comey. Hindsight is accurate & useless.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
Not abt winning. It's abt why people thought Trump offered more solutions than Hillary. It's bc he highlighted them.
@matthewstoller3 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
His solution was the fantasy of going back to a 1950s economy.& white supremacy. HRC didn't offer that, rightly
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
Also infrastructure investment and a reversal of free trade. REALLY important to these people.
@matthewstoller2 replies 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
Sadly, banning Muslims & tossing out the Mexicans was more important. White leftists seem blind to This.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
Sadly, white leftists also pretend that Trump didn't also propose infrastructure spending and oppose TPP.
@matthewstoller2 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
He did. So did Hillary. The racism is what won it for him. This is easy to see if you want to see it.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, that explains why Obama to Trump voters made the difference. Racism. @matthewstoller
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.