So that absolves her for not highlighting it at all when she has complete control over the message? @matthewstoller
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
She could have done more policy ads. But she was winning pre Comey. Hindsight is accurate & useless.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
Not abt winning. It's abt why people thought Trump offered more solutions than Hillary. It's bc he highlighted them.
@matthewstoller3 replies 2 retweets 19 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @shmr50
You CANNOT hold people responsible for not voting for Hillary policies she relegated to her website.
@matthewstoller2 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @matthewstoller
She. Made. Policy. Speeches. They were not covered.
2 replies 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @shmr50
Yes. And as I just laid out, she DIDN'T deliver that policy to these voters in a way they could/would access.
@matthewstoller2 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @shmr50
I don't know where the fuck you get off holding desperate people responsible but not Hillary, w/all her resources?
@matthewstoller3 replies 1 retweet 7 likes -
Replying to @TheRealJMole
OK, fuckface, as I've just explained EVEN in speeches, he spoke more abt infrastructure and anti-TPP
@shmr50@matthewstoller4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Did he advertise that or did the media cover it? Dude doesn't even know what TPP does. Clinton actually had policies, not buzzwords.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
He advertised it. Even contrasted his policies w/hers--as all POTUS candidates ex Hillary normally do @shmr50 @matthewstoller
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.