So CNN sources are: 1) US officials (often, Congress) 2) No comment WH, FBI 3) LE official 4) US officials Also gets date of leaks wrong
-
-
That does make sense. Nonetheless, this smells bogus to me. The problem is that anything like this would have been found earlier
-
and even the "officials", despite being nameless, and having a desired message, still hedge with "circumstantial".
-
Right: Only LE is very positive on this.
-
That is, true, the exact opposite of what we would expect: LE the most cautious, the others going hog wild with anything.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.