Schiff implies there's more solid case now, but the widely hailed case v Trump he made on Monday had some problems. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/03/22/the-temporal-feint-in-adam-schiffs-neat-narrative/ …
You're right--that may be the case. But it's not enough to sustain a charge of collusion (or coordination) during elex.
-
-
This is one reason HPSCI should be investigating before making public statements--to get details right, make a real case.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.