Does fact that Nunes continued to feloniously leak on the White House lawn take him out of Speech and Debate protection? @KDbyProxy
-
-
Though, to be fair, if all info was properly cleared for release, maybe could argue S+D b/c part of investigation
-
If everything done per House rules & then a Mbr releases the info, I'd argue disclosure was not act of Mbr but of House.1/
-
Also, as Schiff is pointing out, Nunes was rogue outside of HPSCI, none of whom were briefed. So I think no S+D cover
-
I think that's relevant for ethics violations, not for S&D.
@KDbyProxy -
Hard to see how it is not completely pertinent to determination of whether in his legislative status or HPSCI investg
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Proxmire case is part of why I said was outside of S+D. http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/443/111.html …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sev real factors. Not on floor is not determinative, but also doesn't concern pending legislation, etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.