I wonder if mass hacking of accounts would constitute "bulk collection" and thus be highly curtailed in use
-
-
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
The only mass hacking they did was of metadata.
@jacklgoldsmith2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'd have to double check but I don't think that PPD-28 rule is limited to comms content?
@jacklgoldsmith2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
First of all, not only one who "collected" that 500M person database is Belan, not RU G.
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
But if you collect in bulk for any of permitted purposes, you collect in bulk on everyone.
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
you can collect in bulk generally but then only use for limited purposes
@jacklgoldsmith2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
How many of those targets do you think US couldn't invent an espionage, cyber, or intl crime purpose for?
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
true, probably very many. PPD-28 but I think the relative limits worth noting, could be good model for others
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
By then Trump will have scrapped it anyway (no way of knowing whether he already has, in fact)
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
& other countries will point AT THIS INDICTMENT and show how much more spying US does via Yahoo than RU.
@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Which partly shows how meaningless PPD 28 is so long as US runs all the tech companies. @jacklgoldsmith
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.