If key issue is press is susceptible to reporting on just a few screens (true of ALL stories) how do we fix? @ncweaver @rj_gallagher
-
-
I'm obviously not press, a tenuous occasional perch aside.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
Sorry. You have a column at NYT. That's press.
@ncweaver@rj_gallagher1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I don't have a column. Ha I wish I did. "Contributing opinion writer"=smoother regular op-ed pitches.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
OK. And that amounts to being press that shouldn't dodge same standards you want adopted.
@ncweaver@rj_gallagher1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
I'm pretty clear. Is the CIA cache news? Existence, yes. Contents, not as reported.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @zeynep
"As reported" by a subset of reporters you've focused exclusively on, not the cache itself
@ncweaver@rj_gallagher1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
"as reported" very widely.
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @zeynep
So not the cache itself. You are modeling precisely the behavior you are criticizing.
@ncweaver@rj_gallagher1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
I think what i said and my concern is pretty clear. That's all i can do. I will leave it there.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
So perhaps limit comment abt what will happen w/full cache until you actually read beyond 2 screen caps?. @ncweaver @rj_gallagher
-
-
I made no comment about hypothetical future. Really have no idea what you're arguing. Leaving it here.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
very simple. If you've read just 2 screen caps your comments have already gone way beyond your knowledge.
0 replies 1 retweet 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.