The news is someone gave this to Wikileaks, sure. Anyhing else in there that is not mundane for Defcon?
-
-
I explained in the longer thread. The few fixes do not really address much; meanwhile huge damage.
-
(I say this for my communities of concern, dissidents & journos.)
-
Not denying the damage (& focus to fix that needs to be on both WL and journos).
@rj_gallagher -
Just saying it's also false to portray this as if it is just two screen caps of iOS and Android vulns.
@rj_gallagher -
If the story is someone gave CIA stuff to wikileaks, sure. That's big. We are not safer, though. The opposite.
-
If it turns out truly unexpected wizardry revealed, that we fix, beyond drops in growing ocean, I will re-eval.
-
You're still playing at Q of "news or not" same thing you're criticizing.
@rj_gallagher -
Look at it another way: How do you approach granular reports on GRU's tactics, which target legit civilians?
@rj_gallagher - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
There's far more here than just two screen caps abt iOS & Android vulns. Just as far more than TV and messaging claim
@rj_gallagher -
That's in no way an apology for Assange. It's an observation abt what is in dump.
@rj_gallagher
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.