"[O]nly 25 percent of advertising supporting [Hillary's] campaign went after Trump on policy grounds" http://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/3/8/14848636/hillary-clinton-tv-ads?utm_campaign=vox&utm_content=chorus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter … y=ー( ゚д゚)・∵.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
I know you've got a hobby horse to beat but are you really pretending *any* ad strategy post-Comey would've worked for HRC?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Tomolitics
Well, her closing ad sucked ass. Trump's was quite good. That's all MI saw, at all. So maybe a GOOD ad would = 11,000 votes?
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Nope cake was baked by then. I could just as easily argue that ambivalent lefties cost her by relitigating primaries.pic.twitter.com/2BBiwhcg28
This media may contain sensitive material. Learn more
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tomolitics
Bollocks. That shows nothing of the sort. Also, late decider rates were different for different states.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Nope. Comey was the inflection point in the race. She won 3 debates, talked about those issues you mention incessantly, big lead
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tomolitics @emptywheel
To think that different ad strategy would have overcome all the email BS at that point is fantasy. Not to mention her gender.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Tomolitics
OK. Except again, there are specific states with specific outcomes that doesn't explain. The states where she lost the race.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
I'm sure if we had the battleground polling breakdown it would show identical post-Comey trend as national if not more severe.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Except we have that. As I've said. We have at least one poll on that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.