.@emptywheel @Thomas_Drake1 So you're willing to say NONE of @snowden's huge tranche, bulk or military, could have assisted real enemies?
-
-
Replying to @TimothyS
You 100% misread my tweet, Tim. Please go back and try again.
@Thomas_Drake1@Snowden1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 I read it very clearly, Marcy. I just asked a direct question. It deserves a response.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TimothyS
You: "Do you question Snowden's contention" Me: "I disagree [w/Snowden, OBVIOUSLY], yeah."
@Thomas_Drake11 reply 0 retweets 8 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @TimothyS
Rest of thread makes absolutely ZERO sense reading it as you have. But I get that's the gimmick here.
@Thomas_Drake11 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel Sorry, but there's no "gimmick" here. My question is crystal-clear. I don't believe@snowden & co's contention of zero harm.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel Wow. Ask a simple question, get a totally convoluted answer with personal attacks. I'm not impressed, Marcy.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @TimothyS
Yes Tim. Everyone watching read it correctly but you, yet you are not impressed. Yes, Tim.
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel Please. I'm a journalist, asking a question. You don't want to answer. Fine.2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
I've ANSWERED TWO TIMES. Plus written a shit-ton on it. You, a journalist, need more than that? That's not journalism, Tim.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.