Conversely, @Thomas_Drake1 @emptywheel, do you question @snowden contention that NONE of his leaked docs could possibly help a "baddy"?https://twitter.com/Thomas_Drake1/status/839462397031120896 …
-
-
.
@emptywheel@Thomas_Drake1 I read it very clearly, Marcy. I just asked a direct question. It deserves a response. -
You: "Do you question Snowden's contention" Me: "I disagree [w/Snowden, OBVIOUSLY], yeah."
@Thomas_Drake1 -
Rest of thread makes absolutely ZERO sense reading it as you have. But I get that's the gimmick here.
@Thomas_Drake1 -
.
@emptywheel Sorry, but there's no "gimmick" here. My question is crystal-clear. I don't believe@snowden & co's contention of zero harm. -
The "gimmick" is you continue to refuse to read the answer I gave you, bc you want to pretend I believe something I don't
@Snowden -
.
@emptywheel Wow. Ask a simple question, get a totally convoluted answer with personal attacks. I'm not impressed, Marcy. -
Yes Tim. Everyone watching read it correctly but you, yet you are not impressed. Yes, Tim.
-
.
@emptywheel Please. I'm a journalist, asking a question. You don't want to answer. Fine. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.