This *might* prove to be more damaging than Shadow Brokers disclosure of NSA tools: more recent, might include tools re messaging apps.https://twitter.com/MarkMazzettiNYT/status/839141826858737667 …
-
-
Replying to @BobbyChesney
Tho (thus far at least) different ethic of release. Looking forward to
@jacklgoldsmith's take on different ethic.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @jacklgoldsmith
Wikileaks *says* it is to spur debate. Maybe. Or degrade CIA capability. Or both. I wonder about the source....
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
If goal was debate they could have first informed companies, given time to patch. Doubt they did
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
They didn't release code. This is less intrusive than some indy security researcher reports
@BobbyChesney@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Yes, but it's still a good practice, often followed by independent security reports
@BobbyChesney@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
I have argued that WL is using a DIFFERENT ethic. Have pointed out potential motives. 1/2
@BobbyChesney@jacklgoldsmith1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
But any debate should talk abt what WL actually did, in entirety. 2/2 @BobbyChesney @jacklgoldsmith
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.