They can do both at the same time.
-
-
Replying to @drfarls
Yes. And wounding Trump for hurting Americans MAY be a more effective way of reversing recent decline than screaming Russia.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
-
Replying to @drfarls
You are making my point. Thank you. I have work to do but I'm glad you're okay with collapse of ideology and resulting chaos.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
You are aware that the Dems mounted non-Russia related resistance on travel ban and Devos?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drfarls @emptywheel
Unless your argument is, literally, that they could have scotched Devos if they hadn't complained about Russia too much.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drfarls
What part of "coherent narrative" are you struggling with?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
Trump "offered a narrative." He also attacked relentlessly on Benghazi and e-mails.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @drfarls
And when Obama to Trump voters interviewed why they voted for him, it's the narrative stuff (incl corruption that is emails).
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @drfarls
Whatev. Dems have a great opportunity to finally reestablish policy as benefit. Instead, I'm seeing RU pushing learned helplessness
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
But that's okay. Maybe America doesn't need a credible Democratic party.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.