Good! That's not what I'm arguing. I'm arguing "absence of coherent narrative suggests absence of coherent narrative."
Well, you've provided zero evidence there is a coherent narrative and lots of evidence there could be but is not. So...
-
-
I don't agree. And in any case you've offered zero evidence that Russia investigations are crowding anything out.
-
How the hell is it every time I say narrative you respond as if I wrote "teeny pyrrhic wins"?
-
I don't even know what this means.
-
Yes. That's quite clear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.