I get that you don't think that. I'd find some coherent plan from Dems far better evidence of that than you thinking it to be true.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The part that is stopped by a Russia investigation.
-
Well, you've provided zero evidence there is a coherent narrative and lots of evidence there could be but is not. So...
-
I don't agree. And in any case you've offered zero evidence that Russia investigations are crowding anything out.
-
How the hell is it every time I say narrative you respond as if I wrote "teeny pyrrhic wins"?
-
I don't even know what this means.
-
Yes. That's quite clear.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Trump "offered a narrative." He also attacked relentlessly on Benghazi and e-mails.
-
And when Obama to Trump voters interviewed why they voted for him, it's the narrative stuff (incl corruption that is emails).
-
So as long as we can count the attacks as part of the "narrative," then it's the narrative, not the attacks?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.