1. Hm. A possibility mentioned in @charlie_savage's piece I hadn't given much thought...https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/03/05/us/politics/trump-phone-tapping-surveillance-issues.html?smid=tw-share&referer=https://t.co/Q9BMgLBTMv …
-
-
Certainly would have been far easier to accomplish evidentiary-wise.
-
Also would be individualized order (esp post USAF)
@FaizaPatelBCJ@normative -
Might also explain why US press (ex McClatchy) hasn't confirmed.
@FaizaPatelBCJ@normative - 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.