Yeah, but there’s a big difference between that and meeting the Russian ambassador. How’d that happen?
-
-
Replying to @pastordan
Well, he called Mexicans rapists. Either because he believes it and/or because he's a reality TV show host who knew it'd work.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pastordan
But one reason I emphasize the racists first is bc Trump doesn't win SC unless a bunch of evangelicals for for him over Cruz.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pastordan
And if Trump doesn't win SC, he prolly doesn't win. If he doesn't SC, he doesn't end up w/Mercer/Bannon.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
All fair, but I’m trying to understand why Russia keeps popping up in the Trump timeline. Why all the contacts?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @pastordan
Because people are looking for them. Aside from the mob/business contacts they are almost all Kislyak's calendar.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pastordan
Imagine how many contacts even Trump has w/Israeli officials, even spooked up ones. (And it'd be worse for Hillary.)
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pastordan
One thing that's happening, w/monofocus on RU, is we're missing similar disturbing contacts w/other countries, like China.
1 reply 4 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @pastordan
Remember, we missed Trump's One China change bc we were led to believe only platform change was Ukraine. Oops.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
The enactment was. But the work to get there wasn't.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.