sharing of raw EO 12333 SIGINT. Flynn calls likely traditional FISA and could have been unmasked anyways
-
-
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
I don't think you understand the point I made or wrote about. Want me to explain it further?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
Jan 2, per story, they discover the Flynn-Kislyak calls we know were 1806. Jan 3, IC expands 12333.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
what would that accomplish if intentional? Fishing for Flynn talking to others?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Much of what NYT describes is comms between Russians and comms overseas.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
so you mean opening breadth of access to investigate more broadly? That seems more reasonable. Flynn calls within clear FO scope
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
FBI (and CIA) get a shit-ton of already collected data on Jan 3.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
right. Or more specifically, ODNI ensures new Admin won't quash its ability to get that raw data in future
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
No. Q many asked is why enable that right before Trump gets power. It's quickest way to deliver raw intel to FBI/CIA.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
my point in qualifying was it was a multi-year effort, bound to happen anyway unless you worry Trump would have blocked it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I know it was a multi-year effort. It also doesn't even have most obvious privacy protections, so that can't be it.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.