i agree with most of it, but wonder what the not disinterested author is omitting.
-
-
-
Fair question. I've only seen people presenting 18F's side. But that may be bc not many people find GSA credible.
-
GSA isn't credible. they're hidebound. but that comes from the FAR which comes from that time when vendors sold shoes w/o soles
-
it can be true that both GSA and 18F are doing it wrong. that doing it the SV slipshod minimum viable product way isn't right
-
Agree. May also be that you can't fix contracting.
-
i'm sure perfection is unattainable, but 1. FAR is great for buying shoes now. and 2. it sucks for buying services that...
-
aren't well defined. e.g. buying janitorial service is fine. buying flexible professional services and research is terrible
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
hackers will always be one step ahead
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.