I don't actually care to come together with fact free fantasists. Maybe convince them to embrace evidence?
It goes back to basic issues of evidence. You've just proven my point but whatev.
-
-
I should know your ACA history-before using ACA as an example of people having different POV on the same thing! Rational.
-
It MIGHT be advisable to know a tiny bit abt prior evidence claims on stuff you raise as evidentiary claims. Just a little advice.
-
So, people don't have different POV on the same event then? Do I need another example? Are the Pats cheaters is a good one too.
-
Hi. You don't seem to understand! You've just proven ACA evidence matters, not POV. Sorry you're struggling with this. It's hard!
-
Okay,I think a lot of historians may disagree,but that is just my point of view. I am sure I am you will tell me I am deluded :)
-
That predictive data laid out in 2009 proved right in 2016 was just POV? Yes, historians would disavow those facts, just like you!
-
You know I wasn't arguing about ACA but the perception people had of it based on the name it was called, but humble brag a way!
-
Yes, according to your approach, a bad reality w/fights over perception is better than good reality.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.