And maybe I will also accept gross over generalizations of vast amounts of complex data too? I want to stay employed though.
-
-
You went to some big wig court or something?
-
So no. You don't.
-
I Sorry, you were Scooter?
-
It goes back to basic issues of evidence. You've just proven my point but whatev.
-
I should know your ACA history-before using ACA as an example of people having different POV on the same thing! Rational.
-
It MIGHT be advisable to know a tiny bit abt prior evidence claims on stuff you raise as evidentiary claims. Just a little advice.
-
So, people don't have different POV on the same event then? Do I need another example? Are the Pats cheaters is a good one too.
-
Hi. You don't seem to understand! You've just proven ACA evidence matters, not POV. Sorry you're struggling with this. It's hard!
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.