Not asked: Do you think using NATO as magnifying/legitimizing force for serial American stupid wars in Middle East is good idea?https://twitter.com/williamjordann/status/833072725304414208 …
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I think you meant, "NATO didn't occupy." Also last I checked NATO was key to US remaining in Afgh and NATO countries in Syria
There was no invasion, "only" airraids to support the rebels. UN resulution # 1973 prohibited ground troops.
Again, what you actually mean is "no occupation." In any case height of irony "defensive" alliance helped create refugee crisis
What created the refugee crisis was Assad vs FSA vs ISIS in the first place, NOT NATO! Even w/o any interferrence, a massacre.
Oh. Okay. You should get out more.
To Syria??? :(
What's your point? Do you believe only US interference started the rebellion against nice guy Assad? D'oh.
Afgh, Libya: formal NATO role. Iraq, no. Syria? Turkey/ Russia but per this, " non-entity".http://carnegieeurope.eu/2016/12/08/from-suez-to-syria-why-nato-must-strengthen-its-political-role-pub-66370 …
Eek! All these wrongheaded proposals ony serve US interests. The EU wants to increase distance from Trump now! @emptywheel
Trump's "can't afford Nato" and "can't defend Japan" were totally irresponsible. Not a leader - so sad!
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.