FBI leaks have hurt both Hillary and Flynn. Absolutely zero way to argue credibly otherwise.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
No one is arguing about Hillary -- or are you trying to say FBI is bipartisan underminer therefore it's OK?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mskathleenquinn
I don't think it's okay in either case. Just noting that Lake seems to primarily care when a GOPer targeted.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
don't see how you can fairly draw that conclusion based on article that I gave you link to. It is evidence of just the opposite.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mskathleenquinn
I asked you to show me where he talked about FBI leaking in that. You didn't respond. I'll ask again. Where?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel
I did respond. I said timing of his writing that article appears to be immediately following Comey's Oct intervention, before >
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mskathleenquinn @emptywheel
>> wide public speculation of internal FBI dynamics. Not going to keep googling Lake to see everything he wrote but plainly his>
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mskathleenquinn @emptywheel
>> kicker reveals his principles on this. But my main point to you is that nobody should be required to pass a litmus test to>>
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mskathleenquinn
It's not a litmus test. It's a test of whether he's opposed to leak (not historically) or just to this one.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Google can't invent consistency that doesn't exist.
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
No, I am saying if you want to check people's record on this, Google probably has the answer. I have no idea about Mike Huckabee
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.