why lucky?
-
-
-
because it significantly broadened the group who would support protests, and did so for NatSec negative.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Alternatively, he may be very smart, wanting an opportunity to attack the courts early in his presidency.
-
I can't buy that argument because I see no strategy where it comes off well, short of an attack used for validation
@emptywheel -
At this point I don't pretend to know. I can see any possibility. But it's not helping thus far.
@ErrataRob
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"It's everyone else's fault, not his." That's his story?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
So why rush? Do Banning et al know Trump's time as POTUS is short and they're in a hurry?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thinking someone needs to dig this up out of the archivespic.twitter.com/KFjdE5S4fu
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
he’s president and he’s always blaming his subordinates for his failures.
@realDonaldTrump,#FAIL, bigly!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
unless we get into a nuclear war over it, I think we're going to be ver lucky Trump is stupid a lot over the next 4-8 years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.