Regarding WaPo scoop https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/national-security-adviser-flynn-discussed-sanctions-with-russian-ambassador-despite-denials-officials-say/2017/02/09/f85b29d6-ee11-11e6-b4ff-ac2cf509efe5_story.html?utm_term=.2558089bd858 … as I noted, on Jan 3, counterintel sharing got far more permissive. https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/01/30/the-ironies-of-the-eo-12333-sharing-expansion-for-obama-and-trump/ …
-
-
having trouble thinking of a shocking anon sourced scoop that hasn't ended up getting walked back lately.
-
Nine sources is a lot.
@BenDoernberg -
“a lot” and “anon” aren’t mutually exclusive…
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Would they have access to all intercepts? Like from 6 to 12 months? That could prove interesting too.
-
Under EO 12333 they should have access to 5 years.
-
That is kind of scary on its own. Did O give up too much to set Flynn and Trump up?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do u expect people to be investigated over this leak? Would that put counterintel people in charge of investigating themselves?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
could that include communications back during campaign? Before they finally got warrant?
- End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.