@DavidCornDC @MotherJones tbf he doesn't say 'was', he said 'is', and right now it is. He cites egs from press briefings.
-
-
Replying to @mehdirhasan @DavidCornDC
the is/was distinction is Clintoneqsue, yes i know he meant currently as his headline makes clear
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @mehdirhasan
the reason, of course, is that we have no new evidence. And haven't had any since June.
3 replies 1 retweet 18 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @mehdirhasan
one can only launder the same speculative dossier so many times.
1 reply 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC
if you think Putin/Russia/Trump ties depend only on dossier you must have missed everything else. See O'Reilly intv for e.g.
1 reply 0 retweets 7 likes -
Replying to @mehdirhasan
That Trump likes & aspires to share Putin's thuggery is not an impeachable offense.
@adamjohnsonNYC2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @adamjohnsonNYC
I never said it was! Much better potentially impeachable offences to go after Trump on...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @mehdirhasan
Also ones we can talk about publicly w/o exposing RU sources to treason charges.
@adamjohnsonNYC1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mehdirhasan
New reporting on leaks from the admin being connected to the arrest/murder of RU sources would be very important.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And there has been reporting. But ... not by the news outlets complaining there hasn't been reporting. Funny. @mehdirhasan
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.