Of course its not "journalism" but it was coverage. As was the NYT, WaPo, etc editorials handwringing over it.
-
-
Corn acts like it's not being discussed, it is. It's unclear what amount would satisfy him.
2 replies 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @emptywheel
I think the specifics he mentions in his piece, especially related to WH briefing, are pretty clear
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @mehdirhasan
What Corn wants, in absence of actual EVIDENCE, is for Trump to pay political price for this rather than other
@adamjohnsonNYC2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mehdirhasan
Me, I'd rather Trump pay a price for 1) stuff that is ruining Americans' lives today 2) that we can build on
@adamjohnsonNYC1 reply 1 retweet 6 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mehdirhasan
3) that has no risk of getting those who might have the evidence on RU killed.
@adamjohnsonNYC1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @emptywheel @mehdirhasan
I also think better attention place to things that might become actual evidence, like hearings & indictments
@adamjohnsonNYC1 reply 1 retweet 3 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @mehdirhasan
this is my thinking too. The ball is in congress and GOPs court to a large extent and they're doing nothing.
2 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @adamjohnsonNYC @emptywheel
Wait. Wait. You're implying that the minority party could call 4 hearings on the matter? Is this even possible?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @dcrockett17 @emptywheel
that's why i said "GOP". The GOP, if they really believe what they say, should be calling hearings.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And yet, there was a hearing JUST TODAY called by Corker where hack & ongoing RU influence operations came up. @dcrockett17
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.