Yes, but social media thing will not impact Privacy Shield at all.
-
-
-
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
It doesn't relate to transfer of data. And depending on how it is "implemented" wouldn't involve EU presence.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
I don't see how scraping private Facebook comms from border search less worrisome to EU than doing it via 702
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Because under 702 we pretend it happens under certificates that focus on actual intel concerns?
@MiekeEoyang1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @MiekeEoyang
shouldn't that make it MORE of a concern. 702 allegedly intel target. Here could be diplomat or doctor or activist
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JakeLaperruque
Oh. I guess I'm agreeing. But still--not necessary a data transfer issue (tho it would be).
@MiekeEoyang2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel
.
@emptywheel It speaks to a USG preference for bulk peeping, untethered from nat sec rationale or targeting.@JakeLaperruque2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MiekeEoyang
Unrelated, but they instituted border passport checks on Bel-Fra trains while I was there a few weeks back
@JakeLaperruque2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @emptywheel @JakeLaperruque
Weird, given EU freedom of movement, but also, given hive of terrorism in Brussels & France's concern...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, 2 kids behind me got pulled for no ID and the cop who did it came back to search their seats afterwards. @JakeLaperruque
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.