This will kill Privacy Shield, tourism.https://twitter.com/rachelnpr/status/829405543311749120 …
It doesn't relate to transfer of data. And depending on how it is "implemented" wouldn't involve EU presence.
-
-
I don't see how scraping private Facebook comms from border search less worrisome to EU than doing it via 702
-
Because under 702 we pretend it happens under certificates that focus on actual intel concerns?
@MiekeEoyang -
shouldn't that make it MORE of a concern. 702 allegedly intel target. Here could be diplomat or doctor or activist
-
Oh. I guess I'm agreeing. But still--not necessary a data transfer issue (tho it would be).
@MiekeEoyang -
.
@emptywheel It speaks to a USG preference for bulk peeping, untethered from nat sec rationale or targeting.@JakeLaperruque -
Unrelated, but they instituted border passport checks on Bel-Fra trains while I was there a few weeks back
@JakeLaperruque -
Weird, given EU freedom of movement, but also, given hive of terrorism in Brussels & France's concern...
-
Yeah, 2 kids behind me got pulled for no ID and the cop who did it came back to search their seats afterwards.
@JakeLaperruque
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It'll definitely undermine data transfer agreements, even if not actually violate their terms
-
THat I agree with. But as I said, EO 12333 already does real damage to actual agreements.
@MiekeEoyang -
Oh, I think you're right about that, too
@MiekeEoyang -
Yes, absolutely.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.