My point is that Pompeo is a far right candidate who has espoused unconstitutional policies. Voting for him sanctions them.
He's supposed to be oversight, not dating the agency. You don't exercise oversight by handing away all your leverage
-
-
how would a no vote have given leverage? Thats the mechanism I don't understand
-
Yes, I see that.
-
c'mon, no need for snark. Same side here. Hypothetical Leverage is gone after vote...How do we know it wasn't used?
-
Look, I'm actually writing stuff. There is 1) constitutional duty Warner shirked 2) no obvious payback 3) tactics.
-
1 is dependent on 2, key word being obvious. 3 is far more necessary for interparty tactics
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.