seems like you were just looking for some confirmation bias (ironically), b/c this is a grossly misleading headline.
But what you are in fact doing is trying to make it be about what you want it to be about.
-
-
what I'm making it about is that your piece misses the forest & focuses on the trees. It's misleading but you do you. Cya
-
In any case, NEITHER 2 pro-H stories that 30% of country believed NOR many more pro-T stories country didn't had big effect
-
Get example for thread from a pot of confirmation (mrburns919) bias yelling "confirmation bias"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.