The Most Believed Fake News Stories of the Election (Tested by Stanford) Favored Hillary https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/02/03/the-most-believed-fake-news-stories-of-the-election-tested-by-stanford-favored-hillary/ …
-
-
I'm talking about actual stories (now emphasized w/word 3 in headline). Not all the stories in aggregate.
-
Moreover, I'm talking about what *got remembered* and so believed. Most Trump ones did not.
-
individual stories, yes. Volume of it shows the Trump stories had more effect. That's why your whole piece is misleading.
-
No. That's why my whole piece addresses an issue you're not most interested in.
-
But what you are in fact doing is trying to make it be about what you want it to be about.
-
what I'm making it about is that your piece misses the forest & focuses on the trees. It's misleading but you do you. Cya
-
In any case, NEITHER 2 pro-H stories that 30% of country believed NOR many more pro-T stories country didn't had big effect
-
Get example for thread from a pot of confirmation (mrburns919) bias yelling "confirmation bias"
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.