The Most Believed Fake News Stories of the Election (Tested by Stanford) Favored Hillary https://www.emptywheel.net/2017/02/03/the-most-believed-fake-news-stories-of-the-election-tested-by-stanford-favored-hillary/ …
I've added the number "three," but what do you think would be more accurate?
-
-
not writing a misleading piece, for one.
-
What is misleading? I'm happy to change what you find misleading, if it is in fact, but you would need to lay that out.
-
the impression that 'fake news favored hillary'', when it overwhelmingly favored Trump.
-
But that's not in the story or the headline. You're reading that into the words I wrote.
-
I'm talking about actual stories (now emphasized w/word 3 in headline). Not all the stories in aggregate.
-
Moreover, I'm talking about what *got remembered* and so believed. Most Trump ones did not.
-
individual stories, yes. Volume of it shows the Trump stories had more effect. That's why your whole piece is misleading.
-
No. That's why my whole piece addresses an issue you're not most interested in.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.