Absolutely. In fact, that's a detail where other sources differ fr Cloudstrike & non-public data would go further.
Yeah, I get that. I'm pointing out details asserted as fact would not then be fact.
-
-
"We had no ability to learn house was burning and had to rely on those nice Brits to tell us" is what was reported.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They are facts. Just not all the facts. And to a person reporting them (without the full picture) they might appear complete.
-
No. Not as reported. As reported they are inconsistent with the dominant confirmation bias story being told.
-
I'll add, that there are further details that are inconsistent with CIA having that clear of knowledge.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.