(Not that I want the list to be longer--but just to be clear, it has no correlation to *actual* terrorism in the US, even recent attacks)
-
-
-
I'm sure the other countries could get off the list with a contribution or two.
-
Or a major weapon purchase.
-
That'll do just fine.
-
It always seems to.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@emillyorr@RohdeD So… Trump didn’t go far enough? We can fix that, if you’d feel better about it. I’m with you. -
nah. Trump has no real interest in better preventing terrorism.
-
Evidence?
-
Tweet unavailable
-
If you think excluding Arabia is sufficient evidence that he supports terrorism,nothing I can say.
-
Tweet unavailable
-
Agree the west has been too soft. Disagree on your evidence that Trump SUPPORTS terrorism.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Shows you what a farce it is hey..
-
It's a "calculated" farce. Muslims with lots of money and oil = OK Muslims with no money and no oil = BANNED
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@KyleOrl C'mon, that was like 15 years ago. And it was only 15 of the 19 terrorists.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@alexburnsNYT we are center of world's military complex & will always turn a blind eye to Saudi issueshttps://www.google.com/amp/mobile.reuters.com/article/amp/idUSKCN11R2LU?client=ms-android-google …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You guys aren't implying that the
#MuslimBan is biased in favor of rich#GCC playboys are you?Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No Pakis either. The place that hosted OBL
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.