In light of this: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/20/public-editor/trump-russia-fbi-liz-spayd-public-editor.html … incredibly difficult to see how NYT can justify its presentation here: https://nyti.ms/2jDhXWO
-
-
-
Replying to @emptywheel
It seems clear the story was "there is a serious and ongoing investigation" thrust of article reads "nothing to see here folks."
2 replies 5 retweets 24 likes -
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey @emptywheel
It wasn't wrong, other places were reckless. But strikes me as a very odd editorial call, in context.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @Susan_Hennessey
NYT was reckless abt Hillary (underlying suspicions real too). They'd do better to say, "we shouldn't report BS anymore."
6:55 PM - 20 Jan 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
5 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.